Journal
They liked you more than you think
After a conversation, most of us assume we made less of an impression than we did.
By ProFluency Journal. Published 18 October 2026.
You walk away from a conversation and immediately start picking it apart. That pause that went on too long. The word you couldn’t quite remember. The moment you felt you were making no sense. You tell yourself the other person was probably bored, or politely waiting for it to end.
It turns out you are almost certainly wrong.
A name for the feeling
In 2018, Erin Boothby and colleagues Gus Cooney, Gillian Sandstrom, and Margaret Clark published a study in Psychological Science that put a name to something most of us have felt but never quite identified: the liking gap.
Their finding, in short: after a conversation, people systematically underestimate how much their conversation partners liked them and enjoyed their company. Not occasionally. Not in a nervous subset of the population. Systematically.
The researchers observed this pattern across several different settings: strangers meeting in a lab, first-year university students getting to know their dorm neighbours, and people attending a personal development workshop who had never met. In every case, the gap showed up. And it wasn’t just a fleeting thing: “The liking gap persisted in conversations of varying lengths and even lasted for several months, as college dorm mates developed new relationships.”
That last detail is worth pausing on. This isn’t an anxiety that dissolves as you get to know someone. Even after months of living next door to each other, students still underestimated how much their neighbour liked them.
Why does this happen?
Boothby and colleagues point to a familiar imbalance in attention. When you’re talking to someone, you have full access to your own internal commentary: every hesitation, every blank moment, every sentence that didn’t come out quite right. Your partner, of course, doesn’t hear that running monologue. They hear what you actually said.
Your attention is often on your own performance; theirs is on you as a person and on what you’re actually saying. The gap between what you worried about and what they noticed is likely much wider than you imagine.
Across a language border
Picture a conversation at a cafe in Mexico City, or a chat with a Spanish-speaking neighbour. You’re speaking Spanish — slower than you’d like, reaching for words, possibly switching to English once or twice. You walk away thinking you came across as half-formed, maybe a little ridiculous.
But consider what the other person actually experienced. They heard someone making a real effort. Someone who chose to speak their language instead of reaching for a translation app. Someone who made the conversation possible at all. The hesitations you experienced as failures were probably invisible to them, or legible as exactly what they were: the normal pauses of someone speaking in a second language.
The liking gap exists in any language. Add the self-consciousness that comes with speaking a language you’re still learning, and the gap almost certainly widens. You are already inclined to underestimate how much your partner liked the conversation; add a running internal critique of your subjunctives and your assessment becomes even less reliable.
What this is not
It would be easy to read this as permission to stop improving. It isn’t.
The research doesn’t claim your Spanish is flawless or that you never make mistakes that others notice. What it says is that the overall impression you leave is routinely better than your immediate post-mortem suggests. The energy you spend on self-criticism after a conversation is nearly always disproportionate to how you were actually received.
There is also no implication here that all conversations go well, or that people never dislike each other. Some conversations do fall flat. The research is about a consistent mismatch in one direction: we tend to think we did worse than we did.
Finally — this is not medical or therapeutic advice. If social anxiety is affecting your daily life, it is worth talking to a qualified professional.
What happens when you know about the gap
Knowing something exists doesn’t make it vanish. You will probably still walk away from conversations worrying you said the wrong thing. But there is something useful in having a name for that worry. When you catch yourself replaying a conversation and finding it wanting, you can label it: that’s the liking gap.
That small shift — from “I was bad at that conversation” to “I’m probably underestimating how it went” — may make you a little more willing to start the next one.
A few things to try
These are small, practical shifts. None of them require you to feel confident first.
Notice the post-conversation replay. Most of us do this automatically. You don’t have to stop it — just notice it’s happening, and remind yourself that your internal playback is not the same thing as what the other person experienced.
Ask yourself what they actually saw. Not what you felt, but what was visible. Did you smile? Did you ask a question? Did you stay in the conversation? Those things register to other people more than your hesitations do.
Set a lower bar for a good conversation. If you are learning Spanish, a good conversation is not one where you sounded native. It’s one where something was exchanged: a piece of information, a smile, a moment of mutual understanding. That’s enough.
Remember what your partner was doing. They were not scoring your grammar. They were in a conversation, noticing whether you seemed interested, whether you listened, whether there was something real being shared. Those things don’t require perfect Spanish.
Give it time. The study found the liking gap persisted even as people got to know each other over months. This suggests the pattern is deeply-rooted rather than something you can fix quickly. Be patient with yourself.
The practice this week
After your next conversation in Spanish — however brief — pause before you start the replay. Ask yourself one question: What did the other person actually see?
Not what you felt from the inside. What was visible from the outside. Someone who turned up and tried. Someone who spoke another language. Someone they probably liked more than you think.
“Our studies suggest that after people have conversations, they are liked more than they know.” That includes you.
Every article is built on published research and checked against the original study. Edited by Cameron Graham.
A question
Think of a recent conversation in Spanish — what would you feel if you knew the other person had enjoyed it more than you assumed?
Get the next one by email →




